From: Spartakus on
zeez <blinkingblyth...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Spartakus wrote:
> > enough <blinkingblyth...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > They had eugenics 'way back in colonial times, huh?

> So you think the indians just commited mass suicide?

Maybe you'd have better luck with name-calling.

>  [--lies about Margaret Sang(CITATION NEEDED)

Indeed.

From: Day Brown on
Rod Speed wrote:
> No one ever 'considers' anything like that with sperm donors.
What the women with the money to afford fertility clinic services now
have, is the genealogy record to eliminate psychos and neurotics. They
also have the scholastic performance data and enuf biographical info
because they've realized socially conscious men sire girls who will grow
up to take good care of the their moms.

And while they dont have the identity of the sperm donors, they can
contact the mothers of those who've already used a given line to see how
the kids have turned out. There are thus family 'reunions' now of half
siblings. I've seen the video in a 60 Minutes segment; they are all tow
heads, all performing well above average, and the older ones are now in
college under full scholarship.

Whether I like this or not, this is what is going on, the upscale women
have the money and the right to these corporate services. They dont giva
damn what your opinion is.

At some point the taxpayers may realize that if they are going to
support kids on welfare anyway, they'd do gonzo better to subsidize
fertility clinic services for all women in the name of equal
opportunity. Which would no doubt leave you and me out of the gene pool.
But that dont bother me.

The nations which promote fertility clinic services will see far lower
crime and psychopathology rates, no genetic disease, and much more
investment as the global financial community sees the promise in the
next generation of corporate staffing.