From: rocket scientist on
I've noticed that newsprint that has been wetted , then dried, burns
much better. Why is that?
I've asked Cecil and haven't heard yet.
From: Dave C. on
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:17:53 -0800
rocket scientist <georgespamk(a)toast.net> wrote:

> I've noticed that newsprint that has been wetted , then dried, burns
> much better. Why is that?
> I've asked Cecil and haven't heard yet.

Adding moisture (water) and then removing moisture leaves the newsprint
in a dryer state than it was before it got wet. -Dave
From: Rod Speed on
rocket scientist wrote:

> I've noticed that newsprint that has been wetted ,
> then dried, burns much better. Why is that?

That sees the surface much rougher at a microscopic level than before you do that.

> I've asked Cecil and haven't heard yet.


From: Rod Speed on
Dave C. wrote
> rocket scientist <georgespamk(a)toast.net> wrote

>> I've noticed that newsprint that has been wetted , then dried, burns
>> much better. Why is that?

>> I've asked Cecil and haven't heard yet.

> Adding moisture (water) and then removing moisture leaves
> the newsprint in a dryer state than it was before it got wet.

Nope.


From: Gary Heston on
In article <georgespamk-DA73BD.07175312112009(a)news.isp.giganews.com>,
rocket scientist <georgespamk(a)toast.net> wrote:
>I've noticed that newsprint that has been wetted , then dried, burns
>much better. Why is that?
>I've asked Cecil and haven't heard yet.

I don't know about the other response regarding it being drier afterwards,
but I suspect part of it has to do with the structure of the paper being
disrupted from swelling and then shrinking. That would increase the
surface area, and produce lots of small, fine slivers sticking up instead
of a smooth, dense surface.


Gary

--
Gary Heston gheston(a)hiwaay.net http://www.thebreastcancersite.com/
"Where large, expensive pieces of exotic woods are converted to valueless,
hard to dispose of sawdust, chips and scraps." Charlie B.s' definition of
woodworking.