From: Cyberbilly on
On Jul 27, 10:35 am, lil abner <@daisy.mae> wrote:
> http://www.naturalnews.com/029286_rainwater_collection_water.html

Gee. Wish I had posted that earlier today. Hey! Whaddya know? I did!

-CB
From: Sid9 on

"Cyberbilly" <wvmontani(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:934db7b3-c313-4e1c-a3da-3631b24c0da8(a)l20g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 27, 10:35 am, lil abner <@daisy.mae> wrote:
>> http://www.naturalnews.com/029286_rainwater_collection_water.html
>
> Gee. Wish I had posted that earlier today. Hey! Whaddya know? I did!
>
> -CB
..
..
..
Two greedy fear peddlers!
Nothing new here.


From: Rod Speed on
lil abner wrote:
> http://www.naturalnews.com/029286_rainwater_collection_water.html

Just another lie with those who want to collect the rain water
off their own roof for say use on their own gardens etc.


From: Billy on
In article <8b8p2rFbe0U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> lil abner wrote:
> > http://www.naturalnews.com/029286_rainwater_collection_water.html
>
> Just another lie with those who want to collect the rain water
> off their own roof for say use on their own gardens etc.

(NaturalNews) Many of the freedoms we enjoy here in the U.S. are quickly
eroding as the nation transforms from the land of the free into the land
of the enslaved, but what I'm about to share with you takes the assault
on our freedoms to a whole new level. You may not be aware of this, but
many Western states, including Utah, Washington and Colorado, have long
outlawed individuals from collecting rainwater on their own properties
because, according to officials, that rain belongs to someone else.

As bizarre as it sounds, laws restricting property owners from
"diverting" water that falls on their own homes and land have been on
the books for quite some time in many Western states. Only recently, as
droughts and renewed interest in water conservation methods have become
more common, have individuals and business owners started butting heads
with law enforcement over the practice of collecting rainwater for
personal use.

Check out this YouTube video of a news report out of Salt Lake City,
Utah, about the issue. It's illegal in Utah to divert rainwater without
a valid water right, and Mark Miller of Mark Miller Toyota, found this
out the hard way.

After constructing a large rainwater collection system at his new
dealership to use for washing new cars, Miller found out that the
project was actually an "unlawful diversion of rainwater." Even though
it makes logical conservation sense to collect rainwater for this type
of use since rain is scarce in Utah, it's still considered a violation
of water rights which apparently belong exclusively to Utah's various
government bodies.

"Utah's the second driest state in the nation. Our laws probably ought
to catch up with that," explained Miller in response to the state's
ridiculous rainwater collection ban.

Salt Lake City officials worked out a compromise with Miller and are now
permitting him to use "their" rainwater, but the fact that individuals
like Miller don't actually own the rainwater that falls on their
property is a true indicator of what little freedom we actually have
here in the U.S. (Access to the rainwater that falls on your own
property seems to be a basic right, wouldn't you agree?)

Outlawing rainwater collection in other states
Utah isn't the only state with rainwater collection bans, either.
Colorado and Washington also have rainwater collection restrictions that
limit the free use of rainwater, but these restrictions vary among
different areas of the states and legislators have passed some laws to
help ease the restrictions.

In Colorado, two new laws were recently passed that exempt certain
small-scale rainwater collection systems, like the kind people might
install on their homes, from collection restrictions.

Prior to the passage of these laws, Douglas County, Colorado, conducted
a study on how rainwater collection affects aquifer and groundwater
supplies. The study revealed that letting people collect rainwater on
their properties actually reduces demand from water facilities and
improves conservation.

Personally, I don't think a study was even necessary to come to this
obvious conclusion. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out
that using rainwater instead of tap water is a smart and useful way to
conserve this valuable resource, especially in areas like the West where
drought is a major concern.

Additionally, the study revealed that only about three percent of
Douglas County's precipitation ended up in the streams and rivers that
are supposedly being robbed from by rainwater collectors. The other 97
percent either evaporated or seeped into the ground to be used by plants.

This hints at why bureaucrats can't really use the argument that
collecting rainwater prevents that water from getting to where it was
intended to go. So little of it actually makes it to the final
destination that virtually every household could collect many rain
barrels worth of rainwater and it would have practically no effect on
the amount that ends up in streams and rivers.

It's all about control, really
As long as people remain unaware and uninformed about important issues,
the government will continue to chip away at the freedoms we enjoy. The
only reason these water restrictions are finally starting to change for
the better is because people started to notice and they worked to do
something to reverse the law.

Even though these laws restricting water collection have been on the
books for more than 100 years in some cases, they're slowly being
reversed thanks to efforts by citizens who have decided that enough is
enough.

Because if we can't even freely collect the rain that falls all around
us, then what, exactly, can we freely do? The rainwater issue highlights
a serious overall problem in America today: diminishing freedom and
increased government control.

Today, we've basically been reprogrammed to think that we need
permission from the government to exercise our inalienable rights, when
in fact the government is supposed to derive its power from us. The
American Republic was designed so that government would serve the People
to protect and uphold freedom and liberty. But increasingly, our own
government is restricting people from their rights to engage in
commonsense, fundamental actions such as collecting rainwater or buying
raw milk from the farmer next door.

Today, we are living under a government that has slowly siphoned off our
freedoms, only to occasionally grant us back a few limited ones under
the pretense that they're doing us a benevolent favor.

Fight back against enslavement
As long as people believe their rights stem from the government (and not
the other way around), they will always be enslaved. And whatever rights
and freedoms we think we still have will be quickly eroded by a system
of bureaucratic power that seeks only to expand its control.

Because the same argument that's now being used to restrict rainwater
collection could, of course, be used to declare that you have no right
to the air you breathe, either. After all, governments could declare
that air to be somebody else's air, and then they could charge you an
"air tax" or an "air royalty" and demand you pay money for every breath
that keeps you alive.

Think it couldn't happen? Just give it time. The government already
claims it owns your land and house, effectively. If you really think you
own your home, just stop paying property taxes and see how long you
still "own" it. Your county or city will seize it and then sell it to
pay off your "tax debt." That proves who really owns it in the first
place... and it's not you!

How about the question of who owns your body? According to the U.S.
Patent & Trademark office, U.S. corporations and universities already
own 20% of your genetic code. Your own body, they claim, is partially
the property of someone else.

So if they own your land, your water and your body, how long before they
claim to own your air, your mind and even your soul?

Unless we stand up against this tyranny, it will creep upon us, day
after day, until we find ourselves totally enslaved by a world of
corporate-government collusion where everything of value is owned by
powerful corporations -- all enforced at gunpoint by local law
enforcement.
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/2/maude
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/28/naomi_klein_the_real_crime_scene
From: Billy on
In article <8b8p2rFbe0U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> lil abner wrote:
> > http://www.naturalnews.com/029286_rainwater_collection_water.html
>
> Just another lie with those who want to collect the rain water
> off their own roof for say use on their own gardens etc.

Your syntax is confusing. What lie?
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/2/maude
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/28/naomi_klein_the_real_crime_scene