From: petrolcan on
In article <xn0gsysi4fvx7d000(a)bignews.usenetmonster.com>, MC says...
>
> petrolcan wrote:
>
> > In article <xn0gsyf7s3wlx6001(a)bignews.usenetmonster.com>, MC says...
> > >
> > > petrolcan wrote:
> >
> > > > So, my question is this, if the seller doesn't pick up or arrange
> > > > redelivery and the lens comes back to me, where do I stand on the
> > > > refund front?
> > >
> > > Send email telling him that each time you have to repost the item
> > > you will be adding that extra cost to any monies he will have to
> > > refund. Tell him this will be reclaimed through the court sytem if
> > > necessary.
> >
> > This is a private seller being a bit silly, hardly something worth
> > going to court over.
>
> You asked and I suggested. If he doesn't play ball and you want to
> potentially lose money over it that is your choice. However, I would
> not let anyone like that do me out of any of my hard earned, no matter
> how small the amount.

I do actually agree with you, except the court bit. It's only ebay.

My ideal situation is that the seller doesn't pick it up and I get a
refund and the lens back as I can always use the lens for spares.


From: Fran on

"Rob Morley" <nospam(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:20100416133923.23fd37a0(a)bluemoon...
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:48:41 +0100
> "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
>
>> Fat lot of good that will do. Even if one files a SNAD return postage
>> isn't refunded.
>>
> How could eBay refund something that wasn't part of the original
> transaction? That still doesn't affect the buyer's rights under SOGA.

Which do not include return postage.


From: Fran on

"MC" <any(a)any.any> wrote in message
news:xn0gsyfvo4pzqb002(a)bignews.usenetmonster.com...

> But the courts will probably see it differently. I know because I've
> done it.
>

Of course you have.


From: Fran on

"Conor" <conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote in message
news:82rhp5FpqfU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> On 16/04/2010 11:48, Fran wrote:
>
>>
>> Fat lot of good that will do. Even if one files a SNAD return postage
>> isn't
>> refunded.
>>
>>
> Co-incidentally:
>
> http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2010/04/16/online_refunds/
>
>

This bit, you mean?

Online shopping customers who send back goods straight away must not be
charged for their delivery, Europe's top court has said. Consumers can be
required to pay the cost of returning the goods but should be refunded every
other cost, it said.


From: Rob Morley on
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:24:34 +0100
"Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote:

>
> "Rob Morley" <nospam(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:20100416133923.23fd37a0(a)bluemoon...
> > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:48:41 +0100
> > "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Fat lot of good that will do. Even if one files a SNAD return
> >> postage isn't refunded.
> >>
> > How could eBay refund something that wasn't part of the original
> > transaction? That still doesn't affect the buyer's rights under
> > SOGA.
>
> Which do not include return postage.
>
>
They most certainly do. Are you confusing SOGA with DSR?

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: Chinky in the clinky
Next: EBay Shill bidder prosecuted