|
From: SS on 6 Apr 2010 08:33 I just dont understand this. In the last 2 weeks with no additional feedback added, my feedback has gone from... 98.6 Then down to 98.4 Then back to 99.1 The only thing I have done is updated turbolister but wouldnt think that would change anything. Anyone else experienced this?
From: petrolcan on 6 Apr 2010 08:39 In article <3TFun.15055$pV1.12203(a)newsfe21.ams2>, SS says... > > I just dont understand this. In the last 2 weeks with no additional feedback > added, my feedback has gone from... > > 98.6 > Then down to 98.4 > Then back to 99.1 > > The only thing I have done is updated turbolister but wouldnt think that > would change anything. > > Anyone else experienced this? Yup, something to do with the averages over 12 months.
From: Fran on 6 Apr 2010 09:33 "SS" <nonense50(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:3TFun.15055$pV1.12203(a)newsfe21.ams2... >I just dont understand this. In the last 2 weeks with no additional >feedback added, my feedback has gone from... > > 98.6 > Then down to 98.4 > Then back to 99.1 > > The only thing I have done is updated turbolister but wouldnt think that > would change anything. > > Anyone else experienced this? It's because it's calculated on a rolling time basis.
From: SS on 6 Apr 2010 10:22 "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message news:hpfd81$g0s$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "SS" <nonense50(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message > news:3TFun.15055$pV1.12203(a)newsfe21.ams2... >>I just dont understand this. In the last 2 weeks with no additional >>feedback added, my feedback has gone from... >> >> 98.6 >> Then down to 98.4 >> Then back to 99.1 >> >> The only thing I have done is updated turbolister but wouldnt think that >> would change anything. >> >> Anyone else experienced this? > > It's because it's calculated on a rolling time basis. > OK thanks I wasnt aware of that.
From: Fran on 6 Apr 2010 17:55 "SS" <nonense50(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:zsHun.205910$ti6.180295(a)newsfe24.ams2... > > "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message > news:hpfd81$g0s$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "SS" <nonense50(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:3TFun.15055$pV1.12203(a)newsfe21.ams2... >>>I just dont understand this. In the last 2 weeks with no additional >>>feedback added, my feedback has gone from... >>> >>> 98.6 >>> Then down to 98.4 >>> Then back to 99.1 >>> >>> The only thing I have done is updated turbolister but wouldnt think that >>> would change anything. >>> >>> Anyone else experienced this? >> >> It's because it's calculated on a rolling time basis. >> > > OK thanks I wasnt aware of that. No problem. It's a bit like average speed cameras, the bastards are out to get you. ;)
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Screwing with small sellers Next: restricted 99p listings |