From: Humbug on
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:03:56 GMT, petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <8jtlg59b30hpm5l24hn1kj0hq1k95mgtgi(a)4ax.com>, Humbug says...
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:53:54 GMT, petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <1j9l99j.dq9yxq1xw6qvcN%totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk>, The
>> >Older Gentleman says...
>> >>
>> >> petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > In article <hebdq6$v3o$3(a)aioe.org>, lurker says...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > as above
>> >> >
>> >> > Why is it that you have an obsession with spacker?
>> >> >
>> >> > He's gone, hopefully forever.
>> >>
>> >> The other half of the Fracker entity is still posting the same shite,
>> >> though.
>> >
>> >Same as it ever was.
>> >
>> >> I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a good
>> >> thriving and useful ng?
>> >
>> >Oi! Whilst it may take a while for the thriving to reappear, this NG is
>> >still very useful.
>>
>> Exactly so.
>>
>> I'm pleased to have been able to take you out of my killfile now that
>> you don't have a troll to incense your posts.
>
>Think about it, why exactly do you think I kept replying?

Yes, I know. I just got fed up with reading it.

>> This NG will thrive once again with valuable posters who are not
>> driven off-topic by malicious interlopers.
>>
>> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
>> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
>> doesn't there?
>
>fran's time will come.

[sigh] Yes, I suppose so :-(

>> The killfiule [1] is still a useful tool.
>>
>> [1] I was going to correct that typo, but it works anyway :-)
>
>Heh.

Quite.

--
Humbug
From: Humbug on
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:43:07 +0000, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk
(The Older Gentleman) wrote:

>Humbug <humbug(a)tofee.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
>> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
>> doesn't there?
>
>Oh, indeed. I see it played the racist card. Again....

Hang on, Fran has no reason to be racist, does he?

--
Humbug
From: lurker on
Humbug wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:11:27 +0000, lurker <graham423(a)googlemail.com>
> wrote:

> Anyway ...
>
> Edward Renner has perpetrated a considerable number of libels against
> contributors to this newsgroup, myself included.
>
> I would be prepared to contribute towards legal action against him,
> provided that my contribution would be covered by the costs awarded
> when he loses the case.

He's made a public apology and has ceased and desisted after he posted
his own address. He's not silly you know.
From: lurker on
Humbug wrote:

>>> Yes.
>> That's correct.
>
> That is incorrect.
> Troll.
>
> [PLONK]

Booooooooooooooooo hooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: Fran on

"Humbug" <humbug(a)tofee.net> wrote in message
news:8jtlg59b30hpm5l24hn1kj0hq1k95mgtgi(a)4ax.com...

> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
> doesn't there?
>

One reply is not an escalation and I take some exception to that statement.
I replied to a comment about me, as is my right.

I still have TOG in my killfile, along with his friends, so I don't see the
vast majority of what they post, thankfully. At the moment, I don't intend
adding you, unless you make more snide comments. If that remark of yours was
not intended to be snide, then fine, I apologise.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Is ebay being slow for you tonight?
Next: Problem with ebay?