Now what happens ?
in [eBay]
|
Prev: Neg or Neut?
Next: spam arrest
From: A Sellers on 13 Aug 2010 08:01 "Niel Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:i435f6$al5$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > "A Sellers" <Sellers(a)Hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:8ckjg8Fia1U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > 1. The seller didn't inform the buyer when they've despatched the item. > > Ideally > > all sellers should do this, but many don't in my experience. This in > > itself > > however, hardly merits negative feedback. > > Not in itself no* > > > 2. The buyer should have been informed once a delivery had been attempted > > normally by a card through the door. I don't know of any carrier or > > courier > > who as a matter of policy don't leave a card. The fact that one wasn't > > left > > in this case, or left in the wrong door, is presumably the fault of the > > driver. > > Again hardly the fault of the seller, or deserving of negative feedback. > > Not in itself no* > > > 3. Once the seller informed the buyer that a delivery had been attempted > > but > > had failed and provided the buyer with all the necessary information i.e. > > the phone > > number and address of the courier to arrange re-delivery there was nothing > > else > > the seller could be expected to do. The fact that they didn't offer any > > addition > > "help" whatever that was supposed to consist of, again hardly merits > > negative > > feedback. > > The seller did not give the buyer the phone number and address of the > courier though, or even identify what courier was used. > > > 4. The fact that the telephonist at the Couriers didn't have a clue - > > another beef > > of the buyer, is again hardly the fault of the seller. Maybe the regular > > telephonist > > was on holiday that week. Again hardly deservong negative feedback. > > The buyer was not dealing with the courier, he was dealing with the seller's > shipping agent. > > * I should point out at no point have I advise the buyer to leave negative > feedback. Fair enough. Thanks for the comprehensive answers. I won't waste any more of your time by asking whether you think negative feedback was justified in this case or not. > >
From: petrolcan on 13 Aug 2010 08:18 In article <f52e93dc-d684-40d1-b98b-9eebb8d6e941(a)l20g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, TOG(a)Toil says... > > On 13 Aug, 11:14, petrolcan <petrol...(a)SPAMgmail.com> wrote: > > <Fracker mode> > > > Another thing to consider is that that is not my only ebay account. > > Oh, so what have you got to hide? > > </fm> Heh.
From: TOG on 13 Aug 2010 08:32
On 13 Aug, 13:18, petrolcan <petrol...(a)SPAMgmail.com> wrote: <snip> > > Secret accounts? They're not secret at all. I *told* you :-))) |