|
From: Wicked Uncle Nigel on 10 Jul 2010 18:07 Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, SIRPip <gingerbloke(a)gmail.com> typed >Beav wrote: > >> "The Older Gentleman" <totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in >> message news:1jlctru.khlnl41pz54okN%totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk... >> >petrolcan <petrolcan(a)SPAMgmail.com> wrote: > >> > > Also, for some reason there doesn't seem to be a decent pic of >> > > the RHS profile of the bike. >> > >> > Yes, that I noticed. >> >> Did you notice that the original pic shows a red brake caliper on the >> front, but the others show a silver one? > >Have you read the rest of (yesterday's) thread? Beav? No. He reads UKRM once a day, and replies multiple times to every thread. Deal with it, -- Wicked Uncle Nigel - "He's hopeless, but he's honest" I've always been a man who's open to persuasion
From: Jim on 12 Jul 2010 06:40
On 09/07/10 08:46, CT wrote: > I've always wondered about the term "full service history". Does it > mean (or *should* it mean) that there is a documented service history > *and all service intervals have been complied with* or does it mean all > services history documentation is present but with no implication that > it is indeed at regular service intervals. > > In this case, as long as the seller wasn't trying to imply that there > was an (undocumented) service within that 23k miles, then they're not > actually hiding anything and it then fits the latter description. I'd take a file full of invoices over a stamped-up book. Those stamps are incredibly easy to fake. |