"Promote the general welfare" means what it says
in [Frugal Living]
|
Prev: Free $3 MP3 credit from Amazon
Next: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~LOVE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: Michael Coburn on 23 Nov 2009 15:08 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:31:06 -0500, Patriot Games wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:29:58 -0800 (PST), Robert of St Louis > <free.tuneup(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>Yadha Yadha Yadha > > Liars are exposed: > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:42:29 -0700 (PDT), Robert of St Louis > <free.tuneup(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>Taliban is better financed than al-Qaida >>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B9NA4O1&show_article=1 >>>So they are sort of like Halliburtin. They are making money by war >>>profiteering. Very practical I would say. > > Thanks for PROVING that all Socialist DemocRATs are LIARS: > > "extorts money from farmers and heroin traffickers involved in > Afghanistan's booming drug trade." > > That is not "war profiteering." > > You LIED. > > "He said the Taliban also demands protection payments from legitimate > Afghan businesses." > > That is not "war profiteering." > > You LIED. Your claims concerning lies of others carry as much weight as a Palin claim to experience in "foreign affairs". -- "Those are my opinions and you can't have em" -- Bart Simpson
From: Patriot Games on 24 Nov 2009 11:14 On 23 Nov 2009 20:08:53 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: >Your claims concerning lies of others carry as much weight as a Palin >claim to experience in "foreign affairs". Liars are Exposed: On 22 Aug 2009 23:31:08 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: >On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:05:05 -0400, Patriot Games wrote: >> On 12 Aug 2009 17:46:25 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: >>>On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:48:29 -0400, Dionysus wrote: >>>> FROM IBD >>>> HEAD: Democrats, bloodied >>>> "Democrats, bloodied over their attempt to force health care 'reform' >>>> on Americans, are looking more unreasonable and hysterical by the day. >>>> This isn't healthy for the republic. >>>The "unreasonable and hysterical" label is appropriately applied to the >>>Republicans, They know if a "public option" (a choice) >> A "choice" paid for by the top 20% of taxpayers and given for fee to the >> bottom 40% of citizens INCLUDING criminal beaners. >The public option is nothing more and nothing less than a non profit, >_NON_SUBSIDIZED_, insurance company that is totally supported by >insurance premiums like any other insurance company that just happens to >be staffed with government employees as opposed to bonus sucking high >salaried private company CEO's. If the "public option" was "totally supported by insurance premiums" then WHY do we have to budget $630 billion? "Transforming and Modernizing America�s Health Care System - To build on these steps, the Budget sets aside a reserve fund of more than $630 billion over 10 years that will be dedicated towards financing reforms to our health care system." http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fy2010_key_healthcare/ "The President recognizes that while a very large amount of money and a major commitment, $630 billion is not sufficient to fully fund comprehensive reform." http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fy2010_key_healthcare/ If the "public option" was "totally supported by insurance premiums" and "NON_SUBSIDIZED" then WHY did Presnit Buckwheat call you a LIAR? "I can't cover another 46 million people for free. I can't do that. We're going to have to find money from somewhere." 8/14/09 - The Buckwheat. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2009-08-05-06-00-32 If the "public option" was "totally supported by insurance premiums" and "NON_SUBSIDIZED" then WHY did Presnit Buckwheat call you a LIAR? "Financing Health Care Reform. The reserve fund is financed by a combination of rebalancing the tax code so that the wealthiest pay more..." http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fy2010_key_healthcare/
From: Patriot Games on 24 Nov 2009 11:14 On 23 Nov 2009 20:08:53 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: Liars are Exposed: On 3 Sep 2009 18:57:08 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: >The >_HONEST_ polls seem to show support for the president and the Democrats Oops! Caught LYING, again... Summary: BuckwheatCare 8 Against 1 Tie 2 For ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Aug. 13-17, 2009. "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Obama is handling health care?" Approve: 46% Disapprove: 50% "Overall, given what you know about them, would you say you support or oppose the proposed changes to the health care system being developed by Congress and the Obama administration?" Support: 45% Oppose: 50% NBC News Poll conducted by the polling organizations of Peter Hart (D) and Bill McInturff (R). Aug. 15-17, 2009. "Do you generally approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing in handling the issue of health care reform?" Approve: 41% Disapprove: 47% FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. Aug. 11-12, 2009. "Based on what you know about the health care reform legislation being considered right now, do you favor or oppose the plan?" Favor: 34% Oppose: 49% Gallup Poll. Aug. 6-9, 2009. N=1,010 adults nationwide. "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling health care policy?" Approve: 43% Disapprove: 49% Marist College Marist Poll. Aug. 3-6, 2009. N=938 adults nationwide. "Do you approve or disapprove of how President Barack Obama is handling health care?" Approve: 43% Disapprove: 45% Quinnipiac University Poll. July 27-Aug. 3, 2009. "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling health care?" Approve: 39% Disapprove: 52% National Public Radio Poll conducted by Public Opinion Strategies (R) and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research (D). July 22-26, 2009. "As you may have heard, President Obama and the Democrats in Congress are preparing a plan to change the health care system. From what you have heard about this plan, do you favor or oppose Obama and the Democrats' health care proposal?" Favor: 42% Oppose: 47% Pew Research Center poll. July 22-26, 2009. "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling health care policy?" Approve: 42% Disapprove: 43% Time Poll conducted by Abt SRBI. July 27-28, 2009. "Do you approve or disapprove of the job President Obama is doing in each of these areas? Handling health care policy." Approve: 46% Disapprove: 46% CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. July 31-Aug. 3, 2009. "From everything you have heard or read so far, do you favor or oppose Barack Obama's plan to reform health care?" Favor: 50% Oppose: 45% CBS News/New York Times Poll. July 24-28, 2009. "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling health care?" Approve: 46% Disapprove: 38% www.pollingreport.com
From: Patriot Games on 24 Nov 2009 11:15 On 23 Nov 2009 20:08:53 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: Liars are Exposed: On 14 Oct 2009 05:23:48 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:14:19 -0700, Shuurai wrote: >> And how exactly are the "idle rich" >> a drain? >Many of the idle rich are receiving income that is not actually theirs by >right of ever earning anything at all. - Millionaires became millionaires by budgeting and controlling expenses, and they maintain their affluent status the same way; for example, 60 percent have never spent more than $32,000 for a car. - Much of the money they save goes to investing; the average millionaire household invests up to 20 percent of its income annually. - Contrary to popular belief, most millionaires are not bankers, attorneys or corporate managers; most typically are locally-based professionals such as welding contractors, auctioneers, pest controllers and paving contractors. -Eighty percent of millionaires are first-generation millionaires. http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=4300 Among the top 5 percent of households ranked by wealth, only 8 percent of their wealth came from inheritances. http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=9858 - The top 1 percent of taxpayers, those who earn above $388,806, paid 40 percent of all income taxes in 2006, the highest share in at least 40 years. - The top 10 percent in income, those earning more than $108,904, paid 71 percent. - The top 50 percent in income paid 97.1 percent. - Americans with an income below the median paid a record low 2.9 percent of all income taxes. http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=16810 YOU said: "Many of the idle rich are receiving income that is not actually theirs by right of ever earning anything at all." YOU LIED. Truth: "Among the top 5 percent of households ranked by wealth, only 8 percent of their wealth came from inheritances." 8% is not and will NEVER be considered "many" by ANY standard known to man. YOU LIED. Thanks for the opportunity to DESTROY YOUR CREDIBILITY once again and thus DEPRIVE YOU OF AN AUDIENCE once again. I look forward to posting your LIES often and forever.
From: Patriot Games on 24 Nov 2009 11:15
On 23 Nov 2009 20:08:53 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: Liars are exposed: On 9 Oct 2009 04:57:38 GMT, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: >On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:26:04 -0500, Neolibertarian wrote: >> In article <f6WdnXwYpd667FPXnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, >> But the real problem is that Social Security goes into the red in >> 2011... >How long did it take to make this one up? Who lied? YOU LIED... Job losses, early retirements hurt Social Security Sun Sep 27, 2009 WASHINGTON � Big job losses and a spike in early retirement claims from laid-off seniors will force Social Security to pay out more in benefits than it collects in taxes the next two years, the first time that's happened since the 1980s. The deficits � $10 billion in 2010 and $9 billion in 2011 � won't affect payments to retirees because Social Security has accumulated surpluses from previous years totaling $2.5 trillion. But they will add to the overall federal deficit. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090927/ap_on_go_ot/us_social_security_early_retirements |