From: Fran on

"michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:7ui1clFmqpU1(a)mid.individual.net...

> Matey is having loads of problems besides me it seems
> he's already re-listed one thing an outboard motor

That confirms which seller it is.

> The reason I'm not naming him, seriously is I have a thing about not
> outing people on Usenet - names telephone numbers addresses - anything.

Right. So, you condemned the Spacker affair, eh? Not!

> When people do this it makes me uncomfortable - witch hunts, ganging up

First time you've ever said that - and indeed, you're agreeing with my view
suddenly.

> etc Mr Humphreys might wish to divulge mateys name which isn't hard to
> work out - now. I was never going to leave any feedback anyway.

Is that why you said you were going to leave a neg?

> A neg at the top of my feedback left
> for others would leave a smell which I don't want.

Too late for that. The smell of your burning credibility is wafting nicely.
It matches the stench of your hypocrisy.

That sound you hear is my wry laughter at your sudden "conversion".


From: Dodgy Geezer on
Fran wrote:
> "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> news:7ui1clFmqpU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
>> Matey is having loads of problems besides me it seems
>> he's already re-listed one thing an outboard motor
>
> That confirms which seller it is.
>
>> The reason I'm not naming him, seriously is I have a thing about not
>> outing people on Usenet - names telephone numbers addresses - anything.
>
> Right. So, you condemned the Spacker affair, eh? Not!
>
>> When people do this it makes me uncomfortable - witch hunts, ganging up
>
> First time you've ever said that - and indeed, you're agreeing with my view
> suddenly.
>
>> etc Mr Humphreys might wish to divulge mateys name which isn't hard to
>> work out - now. I was never going to leave any feedback anyway.
>
> Is that why you said you were going to leave a neg?
>
>> A neg at the top of my feedback left
>> for others would leave a smell which I don't want.
>
> Too late for that. The smell of your burning credibility is wafting nicely.
> It matches the stench of your hypocrisy.
>
> That sound you hear is my wry laughter at your sudden "conversion".
>
>

I've worked out his eBay name but there'd be nothing to gain from
blabbing it around here. Not that it's any use to anyone anyway.

From: michael adams on

"Dodgy Geezer" <dodgy.geezer(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:Z4Rgn.87371$uq2.7744(a)newsfe06.ams2...
> Fran wrote:
> > "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> > news:7ui1clFmqpU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >
> >> Matey is having loads of problems besides me it seems
> >> he's already re-listed one thing an outboard motor
> >
> > That confirms which seller it is.
> >
> >> The reason I'm not naming him, seriously is I have a thing about not
> >> outing people on Usenet - names telephone numbers addresses - anything.
> >
> > Right. So, you condemned the Spacker affair, eh? Not!
> >
> >> When people do this it makes me uncomfortable - witch hunts, ganging up
> >
> > First time you've ever said that - and indeed, you're agreeing with my view
> > suddenly.
> >
> >> etc Mr Humphreys might wish to divulge mateys name which isn't hard to
> >> work out - now. I was never going to leave any feedback anyway.
> >
> > Is that why you said you were going to leave a neg?
> >
> >> A neg at the top of my feedback left
> >> for others would leave a smell which I don't want.
> >
> > Too late for that. The smell of your burning credibility is wafting nicely.
> > It matches the stench of your hypocrisy.
> >
> > That sound you hear is my wry laughter at your sudden "conversion".
> >
> >
>
> I've worked out his eBay name but there'd be nothing to gain from
> blabbing it around here. Not that it's any use to anyone anyway.


I've got Frantic in my bozo bin

What I do or don't do, condemn or don't condemn is no business of
a sanctimonious, judgemental, little turd and megabore like Frantic.
He can just carry on talking to himself.

As to my lying about leaving negative feedback I had second thoughts as
clearly Matey wouldn't take any neg lying down but would reply in kind.
And if he's at all clued up as all that, he might leave me a bogus
positive with further derogatory comments thrown in. I've got 100%
postives and all problems have been resolved amicably with postive
comments - good service etc if nothing else. I don't need the grief
by way of a permanent record just to satify a momentary need for
revenge

While for the benefit of the mountain-top alcoholic sheep-shagger I never
claimed matey had ten feedback, but rather ten items on sale. You can apologise
now or later. The stuff about it belonging to a deceaaed relative was
from when it was listed earlier and withdrawn. He subsequently changed
his mind and said it belonged to his dad - "and he would check what I said,
with him." Ooops! Anyway can you hear me up there ? Anyway Baaaaaaaaaaaa!

Further funnies from his listings -

ALL MY ITEMS ARE INSURED - (insured junk IOW and as are most couriered items)

DELIVERED TO YOUR DOOR (as opposed to where exactly ? Anyway he's lying mine
was left with a neighbour via Home Delivery Network )

NO COLLECTION OF SMALL ITEMS TO AVOID TIMEWASTERS

( i.e He'd rather Charge �20 carriage and P&P on a hand drill already
in a carrying case than have them turn up at his place and see what a
pile of junk they're supposed to be buying)


michael adams



>


From: Fran on

"michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:7ui6c4Fj4gU1(a)mid.individual.net...

>
> As to my lying about leaving negative feedback I had second thoughts as
> clearly Matey wouldn't take any neg lying down but would reply in kind.

Riiiiiighhhht. Of course that's totally believable.

> And if he's at all clued up as all that, he might leave me a bogus
> positive with further derogatory comments thrown in.

Which you could have got removed, and you know that.

Be honest: you didn't leave feedback, because you were outed.

More wriggling here than a boatload of fishing worms.


From: Grimly Curmudgeon on
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com>
saying something like:

>> No, this could not have been the item you purchased after all you're not a
>> liar and trying to gain the group's sympathy by conveniently bending the
>> facts and refusing to disclose the item number eh Michael?
>
>I'm not quite sure how I missed this first time around but
>
>*well done* Neil
>
><applause>

Premature ejaculation, imo. Would have been better to sit on the info
and release it after f/b.