From: Niel J Humphreys on
"michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:7uldtdFe3U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Niel J Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in
> message
> news:hm3sjb$18af$1(a)energise.enta.net...
>
>
>> Indeed it was Michael's refusal
>> to disclose the item in question and his self righteous ranting that
>> raised
>> most people's suspicions
>
>
> Sure thing Einstein. Give the item number when the seller includes his
> mobile number on another of his listings enabling anyone to phone
> him up and discover my eBay ID.

That was done regardless.

> For all your 5000 feedback you're not exactly the sharpest knife in
> the box, are you Neil ?

Nor are you, you can't even count by the looks of things.

> As to your calling me a liar in "exaggerating" the problem.

Nope I called you a liar because you lied.

>I've no doubt
> that being the type of person that you are, not only will you somehow
> "forget" to produce any evidence for what you claim, but you will also
> "forget" to apologise.

I have not 'forgotten' to apologise, that implies I had said I would. I am
afraid I do not apologise on demand pal.


From: petrolcan on
In article <hm3sjb$18af$1(a)energise.enta.net>, Niel J Humphreys says...
>
> "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
> news:hm3n8d$hkn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> >
> > "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> > news:7ukqb2Fdc2U1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >>
> >
> >> I've not outed anyone. As soon as I posted that first bit of info from
> >> the
> >> listing, even Sherlock Humpreys was able to work out the item number
> >> and the name of seller - Elu routers aren't that thick on the ground.
> >>
> >
> > It was not wise to post anything here that gave any identifiable clue. You
> > did not need to in order to ask your question.
>
> Only if you plan on being a complete idiot about it & exagerate the initial
> complaint with lies to garner sympathy Michael did. Any genuine and rational
> person asking the group's advice on something should have no fear of giving
> information on the item being asked about. Indeed it was Michael's refusal
> to disclose the item in question and his self righteous ranting that raised
> most people's suspicions that all was not as he claimed it was & made him
> resort to hurling personal insults at the very people whose advice he asked
> for.

*ding*
From: petrolcan on
In article <hm3v35$1caf$1(a)energise.enta.net>, Niel J Humphreys says...
>
> "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> news:7ulcfeFnuuU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >
> > "Niel J Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in
> > message
> > news:hm3sjb$18af$1(a)energise.enta.net...
> >> "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
> >> news:hm3n8d$hkn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> >> >
> >> > "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> >> > news:7ukqb2Fdc2U1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >> I've not outed anyone. As soon as I posted that first bit of info from
> >> >> the
> >> >> listing, even Sherlock Humpreys was able to work out the item number
> >> >> and the name of seller - Elu routers aren't that thick on the ground.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > It was not wise to post anything here that gave any identifiable clue.
> >> > You
> >> > did not need to in order to ask your question.
> >>
> >> Only if you plan on being a complete idiot about it & exagerate the
> >> initial
> >> complaint with lies to garner sympathy Michael did.
> >
> > What lies ?
> >
> > If you're going to accuse me of lying then at least have the guts to
> > support what you claim with actual quotes. Rather than hide behind vague
> > innuendo.
>
> Oh here we go - you sound more and more like Spacker every day.

Can't be, spacker lives up north, mick lives in west london.

> You claimed (in 2 separate posts) that you purchased as a buy now when it
> was actually an auction listing - big difference in your favour if it was a
> BIN listing.
>
> Quotes
> Posted on 12th Feb at 18.39:
> "I bought an item on a BIN for around £65 this afternoon paying via Paypal."
>
> Posted on 19th Feb at 22.32
> "And as another slap in the wrist it was trying to save money by jumping on
> a BIN from a seller with zero feedback which landed me in this mess in the
> first place."
>
> Ta daaa, you likkle liar.

<snigger>
From: petrolcan on
In article <7uldtdFe3U1(a)mid.individual.net>, michael adams says...
>
> "Niel J Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:hm3sjb$18af$1(a)energise.enta.net...
>
>
> > Indeed it was Michael's refusal
> > to disclose the item in question and his self righteous ranting that raised
> > most people's suspicions
>
>
> Sure thing Einstein. Give the item number when the seller includes his
> mobile number on another of his listings enabling anyone to phone
> him up and discover my eBay ID.
>
> For all your 5000 feedback you're not exactly the sharpest knife in
> the box, are you Neil ?

And it appears that you cannot read.

> As to your calling me a liar in "exaggerating" the problem. I've no doubt
> that being the type of person that you are, not only will you somehow
> "forget" to produce any evidence for what you claim, but you will also
> "forget" to apologise.
>
> Unlike the seller who emailed me this morning
>
> " hi thanks for returning the item ive closed the
> case off with paypal and will apologise for what
> i honestly didnt notice at the time of sending
> the item to you."

This is the same seller who 'threatened' to sort you out with his mates?

> Although again I suppose being the type of person that you are, you're
> going to claim that I forged the above as well.

You probably did.

> As I told the seller I'm 100% honest, and straight you see.

You're not really though, are you?



From: petrolcan on
In article <1jefnhh.16qn9om40av3eN%totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk>, The
Older Gentleman says...
>
> Fran <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
>
> > And if that is true, then I know who contacted the "lunatic".
>
> I doubt it.
>
> >It would not
> > surprise me if that person were the culprit.
>
> I'm sure it wouldn't.

He has to try to get his digs in somewhere.