From: Fran on

"Dodgy Geezer" <dodgy.geezer(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:ftzhn.71513$_W6.55378(a)newsfe30.ams2...

> I used Terapeak, I'll try again, I'm sure I saw 'Buy it Now' somewhere,
> I'll do a screen shot.

It's not on the completed auction page, as Niel rightly says. That page
looks like a normal auction listing with one bid. If you look at Bid
History, it purports to show a BIN.


From: smada on

"Niel J Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hm5umm$1cve$1(a)energise.enta.net...
> "Dodgy Geezer" <dodgy.geezer(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:7Bphn.261287$8K4.39499(a)newsfe15.ams2...
> > michael adams wrote:
> >> Dodgy Geezer" <dodgy.geezer(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> >> news:TAhhn.67828$tJ.56410(a)newsfe28.ams2...
> >>> I know what you're saying, it was an auction with a 'buy it now' price
> >>> which vanishes when there's a bid (it used to be that way at least).
> >>> When you 'buy it now', eBay display the item has having one bid.
> >>>
> >>> You're both right, but perhaps not equally right :-)
> >>
> >> There's no "both right" in it at all ?
> >>
> >> Did I buy it on a BIN as I said, or didn't I ?
> >>
> >
> > FFS Michael do you ever stop arguing ?
> >
> > It was an *auction* listing with a 'Buy it Now' price.
>
> Odd that, I was under the impression that:
> 1) Sellers with feedback below 10 could not use the 'Buy Now' facility in
> their listings
> 2) When an auction with buy now item is sold you get the message "This item
> was purchased using buy now" on the item page.


Just why do you bother chum ?

Anyone checking matey's listings can see for themselves that he's
currently listing items with BIN prices. His very first ever listing
was a BIN. He's currently got 7 feedback or 8 if upi include a neutral.

The same as with checking his completed sales.

Anyone can check this for themselves.

Do you find that telling such bareface lies on a public forum
which can be read by anyone, enhances your reputation in some way ?


michael adams

....



From: Niel J Humphreys on
"smada" <smada25(a)onet.net.uk> wrote in message
news:7v2ja8Fa1cU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Niel J Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in
> message
> news:hm5umm$1cve$1(a)energise.enta.net...
>> "Dodgy Geezer" <dodgy.geezer(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>> news:7Bphn.261287$8K4.39499(a)newsfe15.ams2...
>> > michael adams wrote:
>> >> Dodgy Geezer" <dodgy.geezer(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:TAhhn.67828$tJ.56410(a)newsfe28.ams2...
>> >>> I know what you're saying, it was an auction with a 'buy it now'
>> >>> price
>> >>> which vanishes when there's a bid (it used to be that way at least).
>> >>> When you 'buy it now', eBay display the item has having one bid.
>> >>>
>> >>> You're both right, but perhaps not equally right :-)
>> >>
>> >> There's no "both right" in it at all ?
>> >>
>> >> Did I buy it on a BIN as I said, or didn't I ?
>> >>
>> >
>> > FFS Michael do you ever stop arguing ?
>> >
>> > It was an *auction* listing with a 'Buy it Now' price.
>>
>> Odd that, I was under the impression that:
>> 1) Sellers with feedback below 10 could not use the 'Buy Now' facility in
>> their listings
>> 2) When an auction with buy now item is sold you get the message "This
>> item
>> was purchased using buy now" on the item page.
>
>
> Just why do you bother chum ?
>
> Anyone checking matey's listings can see for themselves that he's
> currently listing items with BIN prices. His very first ever listing
> was a BIN. He's currently got 7 feedback or 8 if upi include a neutral.
>
> The same as with checking his completed sales.
>
> Anyone can check this for themselves.
>
> Do you find that telling such bareface lies on a public forum
> which can be read by anyone, enhances your reputation in some way ?

Really? Since when was saying "I was under the impression that....." been
trying to state a lie as a fact?


From: Dodgy Geezer on
Niel J Humphreys wrote:
> "smada" <smada25(a)onet.net.uk> wrote in message
> news:7v2ja8Fa1cU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> "Niel J Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in
>> message
>> news:hm5umm$1cve$1(a)energise.enta.net...
>>> "Dodgy Geezer" <dodgy.geezer(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>> news:7Bphn.261287$8K4.39499(a)newsfe15.ams2...
>>>> michael adams wrote:
>>>>> Dodgy Geezer" <dodgy.geezer(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:TAhhn.67828$tJ.56410(a)newsfe28.ams2...
>>>>>> I know what you're saying, it was an auction with a 'buy it now'
>>>>>> price
>>>>>> which vanishes when there's a bid (it used to be that way at least).
>>>>>> When you 'buy it now', eBay display the item has having one bid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're both right, but perhaps not equally right :-)
>>>>> There's no "both right" in it at all ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did I buy it on a BIN as I said, or didn't I ?
>>>>>
>>>> FFS Michael do you ever stop arguing ?
>>>>
>>>> It was an *auction* listing with a 'Buy it Now' price.
>>> Odd that, I was under the impression that:
>>> 1) Sellers with feedback below 10 could not use the 'Buy Now' facility in
>>> their listings
>>> 2) When an auction with buy now item is sold you get the message "This
>>> item
>>> was purchased using buy now" on the item page.
>>
>> Just why do you bother chum ?
>>
>> Anyone checking matey's listings can see for themselves that he's
>> currently listing items with BIN prices. His very first ever listing
>> was a BIN. He's currently got 7 feedback or 8 if upi include a neutral.
>>
>> The same as with checking his completed sales.
>>
>> Anyone can check this for themselves.
>>
>> Do you find that telling such bareface lies on a public forum
>> which can be read by anyone, enhances your reputation in some way ?
>
> Really? Since when was saying "I was under the impression that....." been
> trying to state a lie as a fact?
>
>

FWIW, I thought the same but things have changed, the requirement now is
that feedback is greater than zero.

http://pages.ebay.co.uk/help/sell/fixed-price.html
From: smada on

"Niel J Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hmh7gu$ju6$1(a)energise.enta.net...
> "smada" <smada25(a)onet.net.uk> wrote in message
> >
> > Do you find that telling such bareface lies on a public forum
> > which can be read by anyone, enhances your reputation in some way ?
>
> Really? Since when was saying "I was under the impression that....." been
> trying to state a lie as a fact?



"Niel J Humphreys" <admin(a)sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hlp7di$1u6$1(a)energise.enta.net...
>
> But although it looks very similar then it can't be that one can it? After
> all you claim:
> a) You'd purchased it BIN for around �65 while this was sold on an auction
> listing for �56
> No, this could not have been the item you purchased after all you're not a
> liar and trying to gain the group's sympathy by conveniently bending the
> facts and refusing to disclose the item number eh Michael?
>

I purchased on a BIN. You claimed I couldn't have done, and must be lying.

When I showed you were wrong you didn't even have the decency to apologise
like a man.

You just carried on lying.

That's the sort you are Humphreys. Spacker was right all along.

No wonder you had to run away, and live on the top of a mountain miles from
anywhere.


michael adams

....