From: Fran on

"michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:7u8l4hFb83U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
> news:hln3la$n3n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
>> news:7u8hnsFp56U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>
>> > Also I like Parcelforce's delivery policy they leave it with a
>> > neighbour or the local post office for around 30? days
>> > and card matey so there's no point in his refusing it.
>>
>> Wrong.
>
> 16 days then O.K ? Smartypants. Thats what the "?" was for.
>
> "We deliver to an address, not a named individual. When no one
> is available to accept the item, we will try and deliver the
> parcel to a neighbour, or to a local Post Office branch, where
> it will be held for 16 days. A card will be left informing the
> recipient of the attempted delivery and where the parcel can
> be collected from."
>

This bit: "there's no point in his refusing it."


From: michael adams on

"Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
news:hln72g$40r$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> news:7u8l4hFb83U1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >
> > "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
> > news:hln3la$n3n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> >>
> >> "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> >> news:7u8hnsFp56U1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >>
> >> > Also I like Parcelforce's delivery policy they leave it with a
> >> > neighbour or the local post office for around 30? days
> >> > and card matey so there's no point in his refusing it.
> >>
> >> Wrong.
> >
> > 16 days then O.K ? Smartypants. Thats what the "?" was for.
> >
> > "We deliver to an address, not a named individual. When no one
> > is available to accept the item, we will try and deliver the
> > parcel to a neighbour, or to a local Post Office branch, where
> > it will be held for 16 days. A card will be left informing the
> > recipient of the attempted delivery and where the parcel can
> > be collected from."
> >
>
> This bit: "there's no point in his refusing it."

There isn't as in refusing to co-operate in the procedure he's
admitting he's in the wrong. Otherwise all sellers could refuse
to accept any returns simply by not answering the door and
tearing up cards and Paypal couldn't refund any buyers at all.


michael adams

....




>
>


From: petrolcan on
In article <7u7hssFvm1U1(a)mid.individual.net>, michael adams says...
>
> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.25e89f8127aee00b989bf8(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> > In article <7u7drkF8peU1(a)mid.individual.net>, michael adams says...
> >
> > > The problem is the seller is still acting shirty and unco-operative
> > > he still won't admit he was wrong to say I tried to defraud him by
> > > switching the routers. I was hoping Paypal would give me more chance to
> > > prove he's untrustworthy and stil acting in bad faith before I return
> > > anything. I wouldn't put it past him to claim I sent him a box of bricks.
> >
> > I wouldn't put it past *you* to send back a box of bricks.
>
> Why would I want to get stuck with his junk router ? With the guide bush
> stuck in place its only use would be as a doorstop and then you'd be tripping
> up over the power lead.
>
> *You* might send him a box of bricks because you're that dumb, and then spend
> the next four weeks trying to work out what to do with it.
>
> And now that I have his address, I know the c*nt lied about being 20 minutes
> away from a post office as well.
>
> Good value for one line there though. Nice one dogsbreath !
>
> Now back under your bridge.

If you are going to do insults can you at least make them halfway
decent.


From: michael adams on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25e937af26cc4246989bf9(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> In article <7u7hssFvm1U1(a)mid.individual.net>, michael adams says...
> >
> > "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.25e89f8127aee00b989bf8(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> > > In article <7u7drkF8peU1(a)mid.individual.net>, michael adams says...
> > >
> > > > The problem is the seller is still acting shirty and unco-operative
> > > > he still won't admit he was wrong to say I tried to defraud him by
> > > > switching the routers. I was hoping Paypal would give me more chance to
> > > > prove he's untrustworthy and stil acting in bad faith before I return
> > > > anything. I wouldn't put it past him to claim I sent him a box of bricks.
> > >
> > > I wouldn't put it past *you* to send back a box of bricks.
> >
> > Why would I want to get stuck with his junk router ? With the guide bush
> > stuck in place its only use would be as a doorstop and then you'd be tripping
> > up over the power lead.
> >
> > *You* might send him a box of bricks because you're that dumb, and then spend
> > the next four weeks trying to work out what to do with it.
> >
> > And now that I have his address, I know the c*nt lied about being 20 minutes
> > away from a post office as well.
> >
> > Good value for one line there though. Nice one dogsbreath !
> >
> > Now back under your bridge.
>
> If you are going to do insults can you at least make them halfway
> decent.


You'll have to make do with retreads Pal.

If you want originality you have to pay extra.


michael adams

....








>
>


From: Fran on

"michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:7u8mc5Fh99U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
> news:hln72g$40r$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
>> news:7u8l4hFb83U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> >
>> > "Fran" <autumnacorn(a)vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
>> > news:hln3la$n3n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> >>
>> >> "michael adams" <mjadams25(a)onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
>> >> news:7u8hnsFp56U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> >>
>> >> > Also I like Parcelforce's delivery policy they leave it with a
>> >> > neighbour or the local post office for around 30? days
>> >> > and card matey so there's no point in his refusing it.
>> >>
>> >> Wrong.
>> >
>> > 16 days then O.K ? Smartypants. Thats what the "?" was for.
>> >
>> > "We deliver to an address, not a named individual. When no one
>> > is available to accept the item, we will try and deliver the
>> > parcel to a neighbour, or to a local Post Office branch, where
>> > it will be held for 16 days. A card will be left informing the
>> > recipient of the attempted delivery and where the parcel can
>> > be collected from."
>> >
>>
>> This bit: "there's no point in his refusing it."
>
> There isn't as in refusing to co-operate in the procedure he's
> admitting he's in the wrong. Otherwise all sellers could refuse
> to accept any returns simply by not answering the door and
> tearing up cards and Paypal couldn't refund any buyers at all.
>

If he doesn't collect it or refuses it, PayPal can refuse the refund.
Happens a great deal.