From: Marcus Redd on
"Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
news:XESch.39173$bz5.23767(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
> news:4573ed1b$0$2488$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> Further to my threads below (see "VAT added" and "What a lovely cop-out")
>> I've finally received communications from the seller:
>
>> So it would now appear that he doesn't want me to pay VAT, and if I send
>> him a cheque for �87.98 I can have the machine at a bargain price. As
>> if...
>>
>> What a plonker eh? I'll let you know what his reponse to the above is.
>
> Just explain it to me. Why he is a plonker?
>
> 1. Because he sent you mail without VAT added making item cheaper for you?
> 2. Just replied to your mail nicely (bit late).
>
> Looks good business reply to me.
> It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by mistake
> and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself.
>
> I suppose few sellers will be adding "nadamp" to blocked list??
>
>
> Raj Kundra
> Kundra Computers

Raj - you're making insulting assumptions - why?

I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly advertising
it as, and not at the one that his small-print then indicated I had to pay
(and which I missed until it was "too late" - although apparently the DSRs
would contradict that assumption.)


From: Marcus Redd on
"bcc97" <bcc98(a)stork.plus.com> wrote in message
news:1165226967.959104.234770(a)79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>I thought that the OP had cancelled under Distance Selling Regs, in
> which case there's no longer any contract and there's nothing to remind
> him of.
>
> However, the seller may need a 'reminder' about the Regulations!

Yeah, I tried to cancel, but he claimed not to have received my original
email... I think this seller is a lying piece of you-know-what, and is fully
aware of the fact that he's a scammer.


From: Raj on

"Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
news:4573f9db$0$10515$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:XESch.39173$bz5.23767(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4573ed1b$0$2488$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>> Further to my threads below (see "VAT added" and "What a lovely
>>> cop-out") I've finally received communications from the seller:
>>
>>> So it would now appear that he doesn't want me to pay VAT, and if I send
>>> him a cheque for �87.98 I can have the machine at a bargain price. As
>>> if...
>>>
>>> What a plonker eh? I'll let you know what his reponse to the above is.
>>
>> Just explain it to me. Why he is a plonker?
>>
>> 1. Because he sent you mail without VAT added making item cheaper for
>> you?
>> 2. Just replied to your mail nicely (bit late).
>>
>> Looks good business reply to me.
>> It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by mistake
>> and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself.
>>
>> I suppose few sellers will be adding "nadamp" to blocked list??
>>
>>
>> Raj Kundra
>> Kundra Computers
>
> Raj - you're making insulting assumptions - why?
>
> I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly advertising
> it as, and not at the one that his small-print then indicated I had to pay
> (and which I missed until it was "too late" - although apparently the DSRs
> would contradict that assumption.)
>

What was insulting about post?
He offered the good at the price you wanted, so why not pay and get them?

As most of my customers payup, there has never been need for me to look at
DSR (surely there will be lot on this subject now). The ones do not pay get
the Strike and I get on with my work and count the loss part of business
running costs.


Raj Kundra
Kundra Computers


From: Marcus Redd on
"Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
news:4573f9db$0$10515$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:XESch.39173$bz5.23767(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4573ed1b$0$2488$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>> Further to my threads below (see "VAT added" and "What a lovely
>>> cop-out") I've finally received communications from the seller:
>>
>>> So it would now appear that he doesn't want me to pay VAT, and if I send
>>> him a cheque for �87.98 I can have the machine at a bargain price. As
>>> if...
>>>
>>> What a plonker eh? I'll let you know what his reponse to the above is.
>>
>> Just explain it to me. Why he is a plonker?
>>
>> 1. Because he sent you mail without VAT added making item cheaper for
>> you?
>> 2. Just replied to your mail nicely (bit late).
>>
>> Looks good business reply to me.
>> It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by mistake
>> and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself.
>>
>> I suppose few sellers will be adding "nadamp" to blocked list??
>>
>> Raj Kundra
>> Kundra Computers
>
> Raj - you're making insulting assumptions - why?
>
> I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly advertising
> it as, and not at the one that his small-print then indicated I had to pay
> (and which I missed until it was "too late" - although apparently the DSRs
> would contradict that assumption.)

Also Raj - this seller has received four neutrals and one negative in the
last week alone - I've only ever had one neg and that was a retaliatory one.
But I guess you don't care about what's legal or what's fair, just that,
once an idiot buyer like myself stumbles into a trap such as the one this
scheisster repeatedly sets, we need to bend over and take what's coming to
us, right?


From: Marcus Redd on
"Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
news:XcTch.39366$bz5.24907(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
> news:4573f9db$0$10515$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:XESch.39173$bz5.23767(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4573ed1b$0$2488$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>> Further to my threads below (see "VAT added" and "What a lovely
>>>> cop-out") I've finally received communications from the seller:
>>>
>>>> So it would now appear that he doesn't want me to pay VAT, and if I
>>>> send him a cheque for �87.98 I can have the machine at a bargain price.
>>>> As if...
>>>>
>>>> What a plonker eh? I'll let you know what his reponse to the above is.
>>>
>>> Just explain it to me. Why he is a plonker?
>>>
>>> 1. Because he sent you mail without VAT added making item cheaper for
>>> you?
>>> 2. Just replied to your mail nicely (bit late).
>>>
>>> Looks good business reply to me.
>>> It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by mistake
>>> and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself.
>>>
>>> I suppose few sellers will be adding "nadamp" to blocked list??
>>>
>>>
>>> Raj Kundra
>>> Kundra Computers
>>
>> Raj - you're making insulting assumptions - why?
>>
>> I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly
>> advertising it as, and not at the one that his small-print then indicated
>> I had to pay (and which I missed until it was "too late" - although
>> apparently the DSRs would contradict that assumption.)
>>
>
> What was insulting about post?

This bit:
"It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by mistake
and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself."

> He offered the good at the price you wanted, so why not pay and get them?

You're kidding, right? You really think he's offering the goods exc. VAT
now?

> As most of my customers payup, there has never been need for me to look at
> DSR (surely there will be lot on this subject now). The ones do not pay
> get the Strike and I get on with my work and count the loss part of
> business running costs.

Well, if you really are running a business then I suggest you educate
yourself a.s.a.p.