From: nick on

"Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message

> Also Raj - this seller has received four neutrals and one negative in the
> last week alone - I've only ever had one neg and that was a retaliatory
> one.

He's got 18039 positives, you have 36?

> But I guess you don't care about what's legal or what's fair, just that,
> once an idiot buyer like myself stumbles into a trap such as the one this
> scheisster repeatedly sets, we need to bend over and take what's coming to
> us, right?

It mentioned VAT to be paid on the total 4 times, first rule of ebay always
read the description, second if you win an auction, pay up...


From: Raj on

"Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
news:457401c4$0$10196$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:XcTch.39366$bz5.24907(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4573f9db$0$10515$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:XESch.39173$bz5.23767(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4573ed1b$0$2488$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>>> Further to my threads below (see "VAT added" and "What a lovely
>>>>> cop-out") I've finally received communications from the seller:
>>>>
>>>>> So it would now appear that he doesn't want me to pay VAT, and if I
>>>>> send him a cheque for �87.98 I can have the machine at a bargain
>>>>> price. As if...
>>>>>
>>>>> What a plonker eh? I'll let you know what his reponse to the above is.
>>>>
>>>> Just explain it to me. Why he is a plonker?
>>>>
>>>> 1. Because he sent you mail without VAT added making item cheaper for
>>>> you?
>>>> 2. Just replied to your mail nicely (bit late).
>>>>
>>>> Looks good business reply to me.
>>>> It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by
>>>> mistake and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose few sellers will be adding "nadamp" to blocked list??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Raj Kundra
>>>> Kundra Computers
>>>
>>> Raj - you're making insulting assumptions - why?
>>>
>>> I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly
>>> advertising it as, and not at the one that his small-print then
>>> indicated I had to pay (and which I missed until it was "too late" -
>>> although apparently the DSRs would contradict that assumption.)
>>>
>>
>> What was insulting about post?
>
> This bit:
> "It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by mistake
> and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself."
>
>> He offered the good at the price you wanted, so why not pay and get them?
>
> You're kidding, right? You really think he's offering the goods exc. VAT
> now?
>
>> As most of my customers payup, there has never been need for me to look
>> at DSR (surely there will be lot on this subject now). The ones do not
>> pay get the Strike and I get on with my work and count the loss part of
>> business running costs.
>
> Well, if you really are running a business then I suggest you educate
> yourself a.s.a.p.
>

I do educate myself on regular basis by blocking people like you, who
instead of sorting things with seller/buyer take pride putting it on NG.

You must be blind not to take note of "Kundra Computers" just under my
name. It says I am business and behave like one, but shame you will never
find out how?


Raj Kundra
Kundra Computers


From: Mike Redrobe on

"Marcus Redd" wrote
>
> I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly advertising
> it as, and not at the one that his *small-print* then indicated I had to
> pay

*sigh*

Some people might say that you describing "red capital letters"
as "small print" is quite misleading too.

--
Mike



From: Raj on

"Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
news:45740005$0$857$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
> news:4573f9db$0$10515$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:XESch.39173$bz5.23767(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4573ed1b$0$2488$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>> Further to my threads below (see "VAT added" and "What a lovely
>>> Raj Kundra
>>> Kundra Computers
>>
>> Raj - you're making insulting assumptions - why?
>>
>> I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly
>> advertising it as, and not at the one that his small-print then indicated
>> I had to pay (and which I missed until it was "too late" - although
>> apparently the DSRs would contradict that assumption.)
>
> Also Raj - this seller has received four neutrals and one negative in the
> last week alone - I've only ever had one neg and that was a retaliatory
> one. But I guess you don't care about what's legal or what's fair, just
> that, once an idiot buyer like myself stumbles into a trap such as the one
> this scheisster repeatedly sets, we need to bend over and take what's
> coming to us, right?
>

"this seller has received four neutrals and one negative in the last week
alone -"

That is other people's opinion, but surely there are some positive ratings
as well (18039 positives in total)?


"I've only ever had one neg and that was a retaliatory one."

That is your side of story, it would be nice to hear the other side's
version as well.


"But I guess you don't care about what's legal or what's fair,"

WRONG, I do care and need to care to run a business where customer come back
again and again.


"just that, once an idiot buyer like myself stumbles into a trap such as the
one this scheisster repeatedly sets, we need to bend over and take
what's coming to us, right?"

You said it, no one else, but yes it does set in, just need to look at your
last Neg and may be one coming after this one?


Raj Kundra
Kundra Computers


From: Niel Humphreys on
"Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
news:4573fa18$0$10535$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> "bcc97" <bcc98(a)stork.plus.com> wrote in message
> news:1165226967.959104.234770(a)79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>>I thought that the OP had cancelled under Distance Selling Regs, in
>> which case there's no longer any contract and there's nothing to remind
>> him of.
>>
>> However, the seller may need a 'reminder' about the Regulations!
>
> Yeah, I tried to cancel, but he claimed not to have received my original
> email... I think this seller is a lying piece of you-know-what, and is
> fully aware of the fact that he's a scammer.


Yawn
--

Niel H
http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Snowdon-Computers
http://www.ebayfaq.co.uk/
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/UK_Powersellers/