From: Marcus Redd on
"Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
news:NwTch.39408$bz5.2802(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
> news:457401c4$0$10196$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:XcTch.39366$bz5.24907(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4573f9db$0$10515$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:XESch.39173$bz5.23767(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4573ed1b$0$2488$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>>>> Further to my threads below (see "VAT added" and "What a lovely
>>>>>> cop-out") I've finally received communications from the seller:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So it would now appear that he doesn't want me to pay VAT, and if I
>>>>>> send him a cheque for �87.98 I can have the machine at a bargain
>>>>>> price. As if...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What a plonker eh? I'll let you know what his reponse to the above
>>>>>> is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just explain it to me. Why he is a plonker?
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Because he sent you mail without VAT added making item cheaper for
>>>>> you?
>>>>> 2. Just replied to your mail nicely (bit late).
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks good business reply to me.
>>>>> It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by
>>>>> mistake and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose few sellers will be adding "nadamp" to blocked list??
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Raj Kundra
>>>>> Kundra Computers
>>>>
>>>> Raj - you're making insulting assumptions - why?
>>>>
>>>> I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly
>>>> advertising it as, and not at the one that his small-print then
>>>> indicated I had to pay (and which I missed until it was "too late" -
>>>> although apparently the DSRs would contradict that assumption.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> What was insulting about post?
>>
>> This bit:
>> "It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by mistake
>> and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself."
>>
>>> He offered the good at the price you wanted, so why not pay and get
>>> them?
>>
>> You're kidding, right? You really think he's offering the goods exc. VAT
>> now?
>>
>>> As most of my customers payup, there has never been need for me to look
>>> at DSR (surely there will be lot on this subject now). The ones do not
>>> pay get the Strike and I get on with my work and count the loss part of
>>> business running costs.
>>
>> Well, if you really are running a business then I suggest you educate
>> yourself a.s.a.p.
>>
> I do educate myself on regular basis by blocking people like you, who
> instead of sorting things with seller/buyer take pride putting it on NG.

Hehehe, how on earth can turning away customers be considered providing
oneself with an education?

> You must be blind not to take note of "Kundra Computers" just under my
> name. It says I am business and behave like one, but shame you will never
> find out how?

In answer to your question, no, it's not a shame that I'll never find out
how you behave as a business, as you obviously don't know enough to run a
business.

Why did you ignore my other points?

>>> What was insulting about post?
>>
>> This bit:
>> "It sounds you never wanted the item in first place, bought it by mistake
>> and then picked on his VAT practice to justify yourself."
>>
>>> He offered the good at the price you wanted, so why not pay and get
>>> them?
>>
>> You're kidding, right? You really think he's offering the goods exc. VAT
>> now?


From: Marcus Redd on
"Mike Redrobe" <mike(a)redrobe.net> wrote in message
news:qyTch.11457$k74.10509(a)text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> "Marcus Redd" wrote:
>>
>> Also Raj - this seller has received four neutrals and one negative in the
>> last week alone
>
> Misleading.

Utter, utter rubbish. Performance is judged currently, not on what you've
got away with in the past.

> This week he has received 90 positives, 4 neutrals and 1 negative
> and has 18,000 positives in total.
>
>> I've only ever had one neg and that was a retaliatory one.
>
> You have only received 36 positives in your whole time on ebay though !

Yeah, but that's enough for Raj to block me.


From: nick on

"Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message

>> I do educate myself on regular basis by blocking people like you, who
>> instead of sorting things with seller/buyer take pride putting it on NG.
>
> Hehehe, how on earth can turning away customers be considered providing
> oneself with an education?

You bid on an auction, and then didn't pay.

Why should any business want a customer like that?


From: Marcus Redd on
"Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
news:fATch.39411$bz5.9684(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
> news:45740005$0$857$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4573f9db$0$10515$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>> "Raj" <raj@(remove.)kundracomputers.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:XESch.39173$bz5.23767(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>> "Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4573ed1b$0$2488$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>>> Further to my threads below (see "VAT added" and "What a lovely
>>>> Raj Kundra
>>>> Kundra Computers
>>>
>>> Raj - you're making insulting assumptions - why?
>>>
>>> I certainly did want the item, but at the price he was clearly
>>> advertising it as, and not at the one that his small-print then
>>> indicated I had to pay (and which I missed until it was "too late" -
>>> although apparently the DSRs would contradict that assumption.)
>>
>> Also Raj - this seller has received four neutrals and one negative in the
>> last week alone - I've only ever had one neg and that was a retaliatory
>> one. But I guess you don't care about what's legal or what's fair, just
>> that, once an idiot buyer like myself stumbles into a trap such as the
>> one this scheisster repeatedly sets, we need to bend over and take what's
>> coming to us, right?
>>
>
> "this seller has received four neutrals and one negative in the last week
> alone -"
>
> That is other people's opinion, but surely there are some positive ratings
> as well (18039 positives in total)?
>
>
> "I've only ever had one neg and that was a retaliatory one."
>
> That is your side of story, it would be nice to hear the other side's
> version as well.
>
>
> "But I guess you don't care about what's legal or what's fair,"
>
> WRONG, I do care and need to care to run a business where customer come
> back again and again.
>
>
> "just that, once an idiot buyer like myself stumbles into a trap such as
> the one this scheisster repeatedly sets, we need to bend over and take
> what's coming to us, right?"
>
> You said it, no one else, but yes it does set in, just need to look at
> your last Neg and may be one coming after this one?

Sigh...


From: Alison Hopkins on

"Marcus Redd" <read(a)it.com> wrote in message
news:457407fe$0$5833$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> "Mike Redrobe" <mike(a)redrobe.net> wrote in message
> news:qyTch.11457$k74.10509(a)text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> "Marcus Redd" wrote:
>>>
>>> Also Raj - this seller has received four neutrals and one negative in
>>> the last week alone
>>
>> Misleading.
>
> Utter, utter rubbish. Performance is judged currently, not on what you've
> got away with in the past.
>
>> This week he has received 90 positives, 4 neutrals and 1 negative
>> and has 18,000 positives in total.
>>
>>> I've only ever had one neg and that was a retaliatory one.
>>
>> You have only received 36 positives in your whole time on ebay though !
>
> Yeah, but that's enough for Raj to block me.
>

I can't blame him. You really are being very tedious indeed.

Ali