From: Need a little help please on

"Alison Hopkins" <fn62(a)dial.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:4tm2gcF14eiipU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Need a little help please" <nospam(a)thisaddress.net> wrote in message
> news:el4gc7$t68$1(a)news.freedom2surf.net...
>>
>> "Ian Cox" <ian-coxtit(a)ferntlworld.com> wrote in message
>> news:1b0nvor0h8o15.i9tizo5jfba1.dlg(a)40tude.net...
>
>>> --
>>> Ian Cox
>>> Sutton-in-Ashfield
>>> ICQ 116510696
>>> Remove my hat to email me.
>>
>
> You don't like Ian either, then?
>
> Ali
>

Assuming your comment was directed at myself Alison, there is no dislike of
anyone on my part.


From: Alison Hopkins on

"Need a little help please" <nospam(a)thisaddress.net> wrote in message
news:el4kh4$a1$1(a)news.freedom2surf.net...
>
> "Alison Hopkins" <fn62(a)dial.pipex.com> wrote in message
> news:4tm2gcF14eiipU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "Need a little help please" <nospam(a)thisaddress.net> wrote in message
>> news:el4gc7$t68$1(a)news.freedom2surf.net...
>>>
>>> "Ian Cox" <ian-coxtit(a)ferntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1b0nvor0h8o15.i9tizo5jfba1.dlg(a)40tude.net...
>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ian Cox
>>>> Sutton-in-Ashfield
>>>> ICQ 116510696
>>>> Remove my hat to email me.
>>>
>>
>> You don't like Ian either, then?
>>
>> Ali
>>
>
> Assuming your comment was directed at myself Alison, there is no dislike
> of anyone on my part.

Indeed it was. You didn't snip his sig.

So, you love all us fuckers, eh?



From: Need a little help please on

"Alison Hopkins" <fn62(a)dial.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:4tm2jaF14jpn6U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Need a little help please" <nospam(a)thisaddress.net> wrote in message
> news:el4h96$tr8$1(a)news.freedom2surf.net...
>
>> It does not bother myself at all. You, Niel, made an incomplete and
>> unsupported statement and it was responded to, the content of which
>> stands based on your original statement. Indeed, you, Niel, have just
>> made another incomplete and unsupported statement, indicating that it is
>> yourself that is bothered, and again, your claim of a supervised test, in
>> and of itself, commands no respect and is barely worthy of mention.
>>
>
> I think you need to learn how one uses the words "myself" and "yourself".

You think wrong then.

> Mind you, this whole paragraph smacks of Catherine Tate.
>
> Ali

Am I bovvered? No, it was Niel, as you are aware.


From: Need a little help please on

"Alison Hopkins" <fn62(a)dial.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:4tm35mF14lfumU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Need a little help please" <nospam(a)thisaddress.net> wrote in message
> news:el4kh4$a1$1(a)news.freedom2surf.net...
>>
>> "Alison Hopkins" <fn62(a)dial.pipex.com> wrote in message
>> news:4tm2gcF14eiipU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> "Need a little help please" <nospam(a)thisaddress.net> wrote in message
>>> news:el4gc7$t68$1(a)news.freedom2surf.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Ian Cox" <ian-coxtit(a)ferntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1b0nvor0h8o15.i9tizo5jfba1.dlg(a)40tude.net...
>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ian Cox
>>>>> Sutton-in-Ashfield
>>>>> ICQ 116510696
>>>>> Remove my hat to email me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You don't like Ian either, then?
>>>
>>> Ali
>>>
>>
>> Assuming your comment was directed at myself Alison, there is no dislike
>> of anyone on my part.
>
> Indeed it was. You didn't snip his sig.
>
> So, you love all us fuckers, eh?
>
>

That is correct. You must, like Niel, also have an IQ in the top 2% of the
population to have interpreted so masterfully no dislike from the statement
there is no dislike of anyone on my part.


From: Need a little help please on
"Alison Hopkins" <fn62(a)dial.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:4tm2nmF14giqcU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Need a little help please" <nospam(a)thisaddress.net> wrote in message
> news:el4ik8$uo5$1(a)news.freedom2surf.net...
>
>>
>> From someone of such awesome, unproven ,unsubstantiated intellect,
>> something
>> better than that was expected, but, alas, of late, your contributions
>> have
>> never failed to demonstrate your ignorance, this being no exception.
>>
>
> Yup. Another QED.
>
> Ali
>

Latin, again, very good, we are all suitably impressed...... again......