From: Fran on

"Peter Parry" <peter(a)wpp.ltd.uk> wrote in message
news:0jffc5pnuk7qis8u38e0l2tb2lvksj3efr(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:03:47 +0100, "Fran" <usenet1304(a)btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.2531cb16a38ef62f98988c(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>>
>>
>>In the unlikely event that someone had bid it up to the value of an
>>actual camera I would not have gone through with the sale. I don't treat
>>ebay users the way you do.
>>
>>====
>
>>Then you should not have taken the buyer's money.
>
> If you know of any EOS350D going for �5.50 please let me know :-).
>
> Spacker is clearly unhinged and beyond rational discussion but I'm a
> bit surprised that you would think the attempted sale of a photo
> described as a laptop for the price of a laptop and a box described
> (several times) as a box for the price of a box are in any way
> comparable.
>

I did not compare those two instances, nor have I made that statement at
all.

The buyer said he made a mistake, and would allow petrolcan to keep the cash
without sending the box. I would have refunded the money even so, and asked
the buyer to agree to file a mutual so that fees could be recouped.

Listing the box was foolish.


From: petrolcan on
In article <ha8e7k$ntk$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>
> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.2531cb16a38ef62f98988c(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
>
> In the unlikely event that someone had bid it up to the value of an
> actual camera I would not have gone through with the sale. I don't treat
> ebay users the way you do.
>
> ====
>
> Then you should not have taken the buyer's money.

So, again, please tell me how to block a paypal payment from my account.
From: petrolcan on
In article <0jffc5pnuk7qis8u38e0l2tb2lvksj3efr(a)4ax.com>, Peter Parry
says...
>
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:03:47 +0100, "Fran" <usenet1304(a)btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
> >"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:MPG.2531cb16a38ef62f98988c(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> >
> >
> >In the unlikely event that someone had bid it up to the value of an
> >actual camera I would not have gone through with the sale. I don't treat
> >ebay users the way you do.
> >
> >====
>
> >Then you should not have taken the buyer's money.
>
> If you know of any EOS350D going for £5.50 please let me know :-).

I'd love to know too :-)

> Spacker is clearly unhinged and beyond rational discussion but I'm a
> bit surprised that you would think the attempted sale of a photo
> described as a laptop for the price of a laptop and a box described
> (several times) as a box for the price of a box are in any way
> comparable.

It has been stated before that fran and spacker have become borg, they
are now known collectively as fracker.
From: petrolcan on
In article <ha8m0o$pls$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>
> "Peter Parry" <peter(a)wpp.ltd.uk> wrote in message
> news:0jffc5pnuk7qis8u38e0l2tb2lvksj3efr(a)4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:03:47 +0100, "Fran" <usenet1304(a)btinternet.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:MPG.2531cb16a38ef62f98988c(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> >>
> >>
> >>In the unlikely event that someone had bid it up to the value of an
> >>actual camera I would not have gone through with the sale. I don't treat
> >>ebay users the way you do.
> >>
> >>====
> >
> >>Then you should not have taken the buyer's money.
> >
> > If you know of any EOS350D going for £5.50 please let me know :-).
> >
> > Spacker is clearly unhinged and beyond rational discussion but I'm a
> > bit surprised that you would think the attempted sale of a photo
> > described as a laptop for the price of a laptop and a box described
> > (several times) as a box for the price of a box are in any way
> > comparable.
> >
>
> I did not compare those two instances, nor have I made that statement at
> all.
>
> The buyer said he made a mistake, and would allow petrolcan to keep the cash
> without sending the box.

Correct so far.

> I would have refunded the money even so, and asked
> the buyer to agree to file a mutual so that fees could be recouped.

What makes you think that I haven't already done so?

> Listing the box was foolish.

But you cannot explain why.
From: Observer on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25321a141f85375c989893(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> I've already stated my reasons. As I've said before please report the
> auction.

You really don't have to explain anything mate, fracker don't really mean
what they are saying, its just another s**t-stirring attempt, showing them
as the ridiculous pathetic pair they are.

Your listing couldn't have been clearer., (unless they're as thick as 2
short planks - ah yes, that must be it!)) It's rather sad that all they have
to do is sit furtively seeking out people's listings just to try and score
points - in which they failed miserably BTW

Observer