From: Fran on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25351bfa6153c7129898d3(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> In article <haf1mj$o1i$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>>
>> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.25350374140ecf8e9898cc(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> > In article <hadl6v$22b$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>> >>
>> >> > "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> > 1st class recorded delivery. Go look it up.
>> >>
>> >> ===
>> >>
>> >> Why on earth bother with Recorded Delivery for a widget that sold for
>> >> a
>> >> fiver? Sheer stupidity.
>> >
>> > I saw the posting name and guessed the content of reply before reading.
>> > I was right. Surprise, surprise.
>>
>> You wasted your money and potentially your buyer's money.
>
> I have? Even when the buyer selected collect in person?
>
>> You know, that buyer you've not refunded yet.
>
> I haven't? Wow, you're good. Did you ever stop to think that I may just
> not have mentioned that I have refunded because, as stated before, its
> really none of your business.
>
>> There is absolutely no point using Recorded
>> under the normal compensation limit.
>
> In your opinion, the same opinion I give no credence to.

Zoidberg appears to share my opinion.


From: Fran on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25351bf4c2fb62e29898d2(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> In article <haf1og$oai$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>>
>> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.25350bab19526909898cf(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>>
>> >
>> > I've never lost anything via recorded delivery. Standard delivery is
>> > another matter.
>>
>> I've posted close on a thousand items sold on Amazon. In all that time,
>> not
>> one has gone missing - and they were all standard, not recorded.
>
> *applause*
>
> Well done you.

At a cost of, what, 70p per item extra it saved me a fair bit of cash. But
then, I am used to carrying out proper risk assessments.


From: petrolcan on
In article <haf24i$r3u$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>
> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.25351bfa6153c7129898d3(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> > In article <haf1mj$o1i$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
> >>
> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:MPG.25350374140ecf8e9898cc(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> >> > In article <hadl6v$22b$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
> >> >>
> >> >> > "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> > 1st class recorded delivery. Go look it up.
> >> >>
> >> >> ===
> >> >>
> >> >> Why on earth bother with Recorded Delivery for a widget that sold for
> >> >> a
> >> >> fiver? Sheer stupidity.
> >> >
> >> > I saw the posting name and guessed the content of reply before reading.
> >> > I was right. Surprise, surprise.
> >>
> >> You wasted your money and potentially your buyer's money.
> >
> > I have? Even when the buyer selected collect in person?
> >
> >> You know, that buyer you've not refunded yet.
> >
> > I haven't? Wow, you're good. Did you ever stop to think that I may just
> > not have mentioned that I have refunded because, as stated before, its
> > really none of your business.
> >
> >> There is absolutely no point using Recorded
> >> under the normal compensation limit.
> >
> > In your opinion, the same opinion I give no credence to.
>
> Zoidberg appears to share my opinion.

He does, but the difference being is that I do value his opinion.
From: Fran on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25351cb95115e64b9898d4(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> In article <haf24i$r3u$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>>
>> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.25351bfa6153c7129898d3(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> > In article <haf1mj$o1i$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>> >>
>> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:MPG.25350374140ecf8e9898cc(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> >> > In article <hadl6v$22b$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> > 1st class recorded delivery. Go look it up.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ===
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why on earth bother with Recorded Delivery for a widget that sold
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> fiver? Sheer stupidity.
>> >> >
>> >> > I saw the posting name and guessed the content of reply before
>> >> > reading.
>> >> > I was right. Surprise, surprise.
>> >>
>> >> You wasted your money and potentially your buyer's money.
>> >
>> > I have? Even when the buyer selected collect in person?
>> >
>> >> You know, that buyer you've not refunded yet.
>> >
>> > I haven't? Wow, you're good. Did you ever stop to think that I may just
>> > not have mentioned that I have refunded because, as stated before, its
>> > really none of your business.
>> >
>> >> There is absolutely no point using Recorded
>> >> under the normal compensation limit.
>> >
>> > In your opinion, the same opinion I give no credence to.
>>
>> Zoidberg appears to share my opinion.
>
> He does, but the difference being is that I do value his opinion.

We both said the same thing, but I'm wrong and he's right. How does that one
work?


From: petrolcan on
In article <haf2qv$vd6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>
> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.25351cb95115e64b9898d4(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> > In article <haf24i$r3u$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
> >>
> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:MPG.25351bfa6153c7129898d3(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> >> > In article <haf1mj$o1i$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
> >> >>
> >> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:MPG.25350374140ecf8e9898cc(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> >> >> > In article <hadl6v$22b$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >> > 1st class recorded delivery. Go look it up.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> ===
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Why on earth bother with Recorded Delivery for a widget that sold
> >> >> >> for
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> fiver? Sheer stupidity.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I saw the posting name and guessed the content of reply before
> >> >> > reading.
> >> >> > I was right. Surprise, surprise.
> >> >>
> >> >> You wasted your money and potentially your buyer's money.
> >> >
> >> > I have? Even when the buyer selected collect in person?
> >> >
> >> >> You know, that buyer you've not refunded yet.
> >> >
> >> > I haven't? Wow, you're good. Did you ever stop to think that I may just
> >> > not have mentioned that I have refunded because, as stated before, its
> >> > really none of your business.
> >> >
> >> >> There is absolutely no point using Recorded
> >> >> under the normal compensation limit.
> >> >
> >> > In your opinion, the same opinion I give no credence to.
> >>
> >> Zoidberg appears to share my opinion.
> >
> > He does, but the difference being is that I do value his opinion.
>
> We both said the same thing, but I'm wrong and he's right. How does that one
> work?

I never said you were wrong. Stop playing the victim.