From: Observer on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25350bab19526909898cf(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> Sending recorded means that I can go online and check delivery. I had
> one buyer about six months ago saying he hadn't received an item so I
> pointed him to the RM delivery confirmation and he went oddly quiet
> afterwards.
>

I send everything 1st class recorded. If its just delivered without them
having to sign for it, its so much easier for them to claim it never
arrived.
70p is worth it IMHO

Observer

From: Fran on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.253522fb86f171299898d5(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> In article <haf2qv$vd6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>>
>> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.25351cb95115e64b9898d4(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> > In article <haf24i$r3u$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>> >>
>> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:MPG.25351bfa6153c7129898d3(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> >> > In article <haf1mj$o1i$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:MPG.25350374140ecf8e9898cc(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> >> >> > In article <hadl6v$22b$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran
>> >> >> > says...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > 1st class recorded delivery. Go look it up.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> ===
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Why on earth bother with Recorded Delivery for a widget that
>> >> >> >> sold
>> >> >> >> for
>> >> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> fiver? Sheer stupidity.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I saw the posting name and guessed the content of reply before
>> >> >> > reading.
>> >> >> > I was right. Surprise, surprise.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You wasted your money and potentially your buyer's money.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have? Even when the buyer selected collect in person?
>> >> >
>> >> >> You know, that buyer you've not refunded yet.
>> >> >
>> >> > I haven't? Wow, you're good. Did you ever stop to think that I may
>> >> > just
>> >> > not have mentioned that I have refunded because, as stated before,
>> >> > its
>> >> > really none of your business.
>> >> >
>> >> >> There is absolutely no point using Recorded
>> >> >> under the normal compensation limit.
>> >> >
>> >> > In your opinion, the same opinion I give no credence to.
>> >>
>> >> Zoidberg appears to share my opinion.
>> >
>> > He does, but the difference being is that I do value his opinion.
>>
>> We both said the same thing, but I'm wrong and he's right. How does that
>> one
>> work?
>
> I never said you were wrong. Stop playing the victim.

If you were not saying I was wrong, what was the meaning of this phrase: "
In your opinion, the same opinion I give no credence to." ? Does credence
not mean belief or truth?

I don't play, which annoys you, I realise.


From: petrolcan on
In article <8vrmc51m3qofme8t6cgrfj43s04akon8p1(a)4ax.com>, Spacker says...
>
> petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >In article <haf1mj$o1i$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
> >
> >> >> >> There is absolutely no point using Recorded
> >> >> >> under the normal compensation limit.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >In your opinion, the same opinion I give no credence to.
> >> >>
> >> >> Because he's foreign?
> >> >
> >> >No.
> >>
> >> Because he has stated anti-racist views?
> >
> >No.
>
> He likes the wrong god?

You're now saying there is a *wrong* god?
From: Jim Brittin pedigreeZZZZ on
In article <MPG.253549dc4e97bd7b9898dc(a)text.news.virginmedia.com>,
petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com says...
> In article <goamc59gr1c078lgudkpkm5t1adp1d0os6(a)4ax.com>, Spacker says...
> >
> > petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >In article <re5mc59v801q7d0lfvsvsrtfcqm07uldol(a)4ax.com>, Spacker says...
> > >>
> > >> petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >In article <1j75pvq.193b74usmrvggN%totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk>, The
> > >> >Older Gentleman says...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > You mean my most recent neg? That buyer was expecting something that was
> > >> >> > not listed or pictured. He was a fuckwit.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Heh. You weren't selling an old Honda instrument console, were you?
> > >> >
> > >> >A canon lens. Text described a lens and front lens cap. Picture showed a
> > >> >lens and front lens cap.
> > >> >
> > >> >Fuckwit then tries to get me to pay him so that he can buy the correct
> > >> >rear lens cap that wasn't included.
> > >>
> > >> But what did the title say, and what was shown in the photo?
> > >
> > >Title was "Canon 18-55mm EF-S AF Lens for DSLR + cap EX No Res"
> >
> > The buyer probably assumed the word "cap" in the title meant that any
> > required caps would be included.
>
> Meaning that the buyer was a fuckwit. If both lens caps were included I
> would have put 'caps' in the title and not just cap.
>
> > In records, "EX" as a description of
> > condition means that everything that should be with the record is
> > actually with the record, and is in generally excellent condition. If
> > any of the inserts are missing, or if there is any more than just
> > minor damage, it cannot be described as "EX"
>
> I wasn't selling a record.
>
> > >Photo showed the lens and the front lens cap.
> >
> > From the front, so that the back of the lens is obscured?
>
> From every angle and included photos taken using the actual lens. I do
> this with any lens I sell so as to avoid confusion.
>
> Something just like this:
>
> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/petrolcan/Tokina2035mm?
> authkey=Gv1sRgCJP4sdHUsLXfNg&feat=directlink
>
>It really couldn't be any clearer.


Attractive cat, yours?
From: The Older Gentleman on
petrolcan <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> You're now saying there is a *wrong* god?

Oh, wow. Now that opens a whole new can of worms :-))


--
BMW K1100LT & K100RS Ducati 750SS Triumph Street Triple Honda CB400F
Suzuki TS250 chateaudotmurrayatidnetdotcom
Nothing damages a machine more than an ignoramus with a manual, a
can-do attitude and a set of cheap tools