From: Fran on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2532f15980df6ac29898aa(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> In article <haamj8$9or$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>>
>> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.2532ebbdb7bd1d3e9898a8(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> > In article <haajb9$du6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>> >>
>> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:MPG.2532e01f86cebadf9898a3(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> >> > In article <haahjh$ui5$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >
>> >> >> > Seems to avoid direct questions a lot too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You need to read posts properly.
>> >> >
>> >> > Your saying you don't avoid questions?
>> >> >
>> >> > What about when I asked you if you had ever done 31mph in a 30 zone
>> >> > a
>> >> > while back after you boasted of having never broken the law?
>> >> >
>> >> > Did you not answer that to prevent looking even more holier than
>> >> > thou?
>> >>
>> >> No to both questions.
>> >
>> > I don't believe you, not that that should worry you too much.
>>
>> If you were determined to call me a liar, what was the point of asking
>> the
>> question in the first place? Seems a pretty pointless action.
>
> Determined to call you a liar? Don't be so deluded.

So why ask the questions?

>
>> btw, if you'd bothered to check, you'd have noticed a large time gap in
>> my
>> posting here. When one is in a place with only satphone ISP access, it's
>> a
>> total waste of money to read Usenet. Hence, the rather boring reason why
>> you
>> didn't get an answer, if indeed you did ever ask the questions.
>
> I didn't bother to check, you're not that important.

So why ask the questions?


From: Fran on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2532f1a2cb02d07e9898ab(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> In article <haamk0$9vg$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>>
>> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.2532ec318d1f16859898a9(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> > In article <haaki4$ohh$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Fran says...
>> >>
>> >> "petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> >> > No, you lied when you called me a rip off seller. End of.
>> >>
>> >> Have you refunded your buyer yet?
>> >
>> > What difference does that make?
>>
>> Think about it.
>
> Okay, if I say yes, you say well done and if I say no, you remain on the
> spacker bandwagon calling me a rip off seller.
>
> What do I win?

Self respect.


From: Fran on

"Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@drzoidberg.co.uk> wrote in
message news:haar9v$ioh$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> "The Older Gentleman" <totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1j72v9c.e3htvz1ns90w0N%totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk...
>> Dr Zoidberg <AlexNOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@drzoidberg.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes , of course it would be if you'd claimed that the box contained a
>>> camera.
>>> Shame nobody here did , you clueless fuckwit
>>
>> Do you understand now why he was kicked off eBay, according to other
>> reports?
>>
>
> I'm amazed he can work a PC
>

I'm surprised at your take on all this. Somewhat disappointed, too, and I'm
rather wondering if you're influenced by the participants rather than the
actions.


From: Fran on

"petrolcan" <petrolcanSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25330533a652d54c9898ae(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...

> The split in this group has nothing to do with race. There are two sub
> groups, those that likes you (your sock puppets and fran) and those that
> don't (everyone else). Simple enough, even for you.

For the sake of accuracy: I do not "like" or "dislike" anyone here. I
comment on their stated and displayed behaviours. I do wonder, yet again,
why it is deemed necessary by some to descend into mere insults rather than
attempting to discuss.


From: Fran on

"Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@drzoidberg.co.uk> wrote in
message news:haaqmm$djr$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> "The Older Gentleman" <totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1j72qsv.puqdn9mix9wiN%totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk...
>> Dr Zoidberg <AlexNOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@drzoidberg.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you see all the othere people queueing up to throw bread to him?
>>>
>>> No?
>>>
>>> That's because they think you are wrong.
>>
>> Point of order: except for the other half of the Fracker xenomorph.
>>
>
> They aren't people :0)
>

Mr. Cook, I am now distinctly disappointed in you. I'd thought you able to
debate without descending to this. That attitude - "someone is not a
person" - has been used to excuse the inexcusable over centuries in
countries that didn't know better. I'd have thought a British ex police
officer would not think like that. I saw police behave in that way in other
places, but thought it not an attitude to be condoned here by such as you.