From: donquijote1954 on
On Mar 15, 4:05 pm, catbrie...(a)yahoo.com wrote:

> > And thinking. And organizing. MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION would be a
> > nice way to go, if most people were given THE CHOICE. I know it sounds
> > scary to the hungry dinosaur, but that's the way to go toward
> > efficiency. There should be a place for bikes, public transportation,
> > and why not, SUVs --either with higher taxes or stricter license or
> > both.
>
> Taxes on 4X4 vehicles will disadvantage people living in the country.
> I am not enthusiastic about that, obviously. But a well matrixed
> transportational infrastructure does not need to disadvantage anyone.
> If municipalities wish to charge a user's fee on vehicles over a
> certain weight and MPG and they offer safe, affordable and reliable
> mass transit alternatives, that might be a good idea.
>

OK, I'm emphasizing here the terms OVERSIZED and UNNECESSARY, as in
Stupid Unnecessary Vehicles. And they are covered in your proposal.
Proposal taken! ;)

I like your honesty and the honesty of Paul Newman's daughter, a
concerned ecologist, who defends driving her Porsche. Fine! See, she
proposes riding public transportation 6 days and then the Porsche on
the 7th day. Who can go back to a little Toyota mowing machine when
you drove a Porsche! Luckily I haven't driven one (but I drove a
little Toyota mowing machine), so I'm happy with my SUBicycle for the
time being.