|
Prev: Constant Wrong Number Debt Collector Calls
Next: Dangers of eating pork (warning - disgusting) question
From: donquijote1954 on 15 Mar 2007 16:30 On Mar 15, 4:05 pm, catbrie...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > And thinking. And organizing. MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION would be a > > nice way to go, if most people were given THE CHOICE. I know it sounds > > scary to the hungry dinosaur, but that's the way to go toward > > efficiency. There should be a place for bikes, public transportation, > > and why not, SUVs --either with higher taxes or stricter license or > > both. > > Taxes on 4X4 vehicles will disadvantage people living in the country. > I am not enthusiastic about that, obviously. But a well matrixed > transportational infrastructure does not need to disadvantage anyone. > If municipalities wish to charge a user's fee on vehicles over a > certain weight and MPG and they offer safe, affordable and reliable > mass transit alternatives, that might be a good idea. > OK, I'm emphasizing here the terms OVERSIZED and UNNECESSARY, as in Stupid Unnecessary Vehicles. And they are covered in your proposal. Proposal taken! ;) I like your honesty and the honesty of Paul Newman's daughter, a concerned ecologist, who defends driving her Porsche. Fine! See, she proposes riding public transportation 6 days and then the Porsche on the 7th day. Who can go back to a little Toyota mowing machine when you drove a Porsche! Luckily I haven't driven one (but I drove a little Toyota mowing machine), so I'm happy with my SUBicycle for the time being. |